MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1851386147 · doi:10.1039/c5dt02346g

Structural and magnetic properties of mixed Co–Ln (Ln = Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd and Ho) diethyleneglycolate complexes

2015· article· en· W1851386147 on OpenAlexaff
A. Abdallah, Thomas Gaudisson, Romain Sibille, Sophie Nowak, W. Cheikhrouhou‐Koubaa, Kōzō Shinoda, Manuel François, Souad Ammar

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtended X-ray absorption fine structureCrystallographySuperexchangeMonoclinic crystal systemAntiferromagnetismBimetallic stripXANESChemistryCobaltAbsorption (acoustics)IsostructuralMaterials scienceAbsorption spectroscopySpectroscopyCrystal structureInorganic chemistryIonMetal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New hybrid compounds LnCoCl(deg)2 (deg = diethyleneglycolate; Ln = Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd and Ho) have been synthesized by mixing cobalt and rare earth cations in a boiling diethyleneglycol (degH2) medium. Their crystallographic structures have been ab initio solved from synchrotron powder diffraction data. They consist of edge sharing tetrameric sub-units [(Ln2Co2)(deg)4(Cl)2] forming 1D infinite chains along the c parameter of a monoclinic unit cell (SG = C2/c). The five- and seven-coordination of Co(2+) and Ln(3+) cations inferred from the crystallographic results is confirmed by UV-visible absorption and Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy. In the LnCoCl(deg)2 (Ln = Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Ho) series, weak antiferromagnetic superexchange interactions have been evidenced, between high spin Co(2+) and Ln(3+) orbitally degenerate cations. These materials are considered as potential precursors for the simultaneous reduction of Co-Ln-glycolate species into bimetallic nanoparticles by the polyol process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicMagnetism in coordination complexesFrench-language works237,207