Enzymatic activity of <i>Cydia pomonella</i> larvae reared on diets produced with agro‐industrial hydrolyzed wastes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND This study compared the physical‐chemical characteristics and the nutrient potential of brewery wastewater ( BWW ) and apple juice industry sludge referred to as pomace ( POM ). The use of these wastes as alternative nutrients by replacing the standard components (soya flour, wheat germ and yeast extract) allowed production of a balanced diet for rearing codling moth ( CM ) larvae. RESULTS The hydrolysis pretreatment (100 °C/30 min) contributed to enhancing the nutritive potential (almost 600%) and improved the viscosity (decreased from 770.5 to 435 mPa s for BWW and from 460 to 383 mPa s for POM ) of the waste. The BWWH + SF diet supplied higher assimilated nutrients (2.071 mg proteins, 2.274 mg carbohydrates and 0.974 mg lipids) showing higher breeding efficiency (93% hatching, 85% larvae, 76% cocoon and 70% adults). Furthermore, the results of the larvae breeding on BWWH + SF diet was the best which for the enzymatic activity (59.7 UI mL ‐1 protease, 2.9 mg L −1 amylase and 1.93 U mg −1 lipase), consumption rates of proteins (451.79 mg kg −1 ), carbohydrates (396.43 mg kg −1 ) and lipids (91.07 mg kg −1 ) consumed on these diets. CONCLUSIONS BWWH + SF was the best diet with respect to enzymatic activity, consumption of nutrients and larval breeding efficiency compared with POMH + SF and the standard diet. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it