MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Using Nonverbal Communication in Politics

2011· article· en· W1851654717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLanguage, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonverbal communicationGestureBody languageSilencePsychologyRhetoricPersuasionCommunication studiesPolitical communicationPoliticsFacial expressionCommunicationStyle (visual arts)LinguisticsSocial psychologyAestheticsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonverbal communication as being a fundamental aspect of communication, meaning “nonverbal symbolic codes applied in relations in daily life”, is used mostly unconsciously but continuously. It is revealed in the researches that 38% of communication is comprised of audio codes, %55 body language and 7% words. As can be seen, importance of nonverbal communication is undeniable. General opinion in society is that nonverbal communication is comprised of just gestures and mimics. But voice, word accent, silence, colors, body posture and angle, touching, smell, use of objects, sense of place and time, dressing, accessories used, walking style etc. are included in nonverbal communication. As can be seen, nonverbal communication covers items which are non-verbal and cannot be expressed with words. In addition to rhetoric, when a community is evaluating political leaders they resorts to some other information. This information is usually obtained from nonverbal communication. Voters in the society and other national societies take into account when communicating face to face with politicians the tone of voice, rhetoric, dominance of the mother tongue language, as well as the dress style, jewelry, accessories, body posture, gestures and facial expressions as non-verbal communication and persuasion factors. In the presentations and international relation conferences the non-verbal elements, as stated before, are much more effective, easier to recall, cogent and persuasive than elements of written communication of the political leaders messages. “How are the non-verbal communication items used by political leaders” is the starting point and the question for this article. Because today nonverbal communication items are effective to create political image and has an important dimension in the international politics. In this article, these items are reviewed with examples in communication literature. Key words: Nonverbal communication; Politics; Political leader Resume La communication non verbale comme etant un aspect fondamental de la communication, qui signifie «non verbale codes symboliques appliquee dans les relations dans la vie quotidienne, est utilise plus souvent inconsciemment mais continuellement. Il est revele dans les recherches que 38% de la communication est compose de codes audio, le langage corporel de 55% et les mots de 7%. Comme on peut le voir, l'importance de la communication non verbale est indeniable. L'opinion generale dans la societe, c'est que la communication non verbale est composee de gestes et mimiques simplement. Mais la voix, l'accent parole, le silence, les couleurs, la posture du corps et de l'angle, le toucher, l'odorat, l'utilisation d'objets, le sens du lieu et de temps, l'habillage, les accessoires utilises, la marche de style etc sont inclus dans la communication non verbale. Comme on peut le constater, la communication non verbale couvre les elements qui sont non-verbale et ne peut pas etre exprime avec des mots. En plus de la rhetorique, quand une communaute est d'evaluer les dirigeants politiques qu'ils recourt a certaines autres informations. Cette information est generalement obtenu a partir de la communication non verbale. Les electeurs de la societe et d'autres societes nationales de prendre en compte lors de la communication face a face avec les politiciens du ton de la voix, la rhetorique, la dominance de la langue maternelle, ainsi que le style vestimentaire, des bijoux, des accessoires, la posture, les gestes et les expressions faciales que la communication non verbale et les facteurs de la persuasion. Dans les presentations et les conferences internationales concernant les elements non-verbaux, comme indique precedemment, sont beaucoup plus efficaces, plus faciles a rappeler, forte et persuasive que les elements de la communication ecrite des messages des dirigeants politiques. «Comment sont les elements de communication non-verbale utilisee par les dirigeants politiques » est le point de depart et la question de cet article. Parce que les elements de communication non verbale sont aujourd'hui efficaces pour creer l'image politique et a une dimension importante dans la politique internationale. Dans cet article, ces articles sont revus par des exemples dans la litterature de la communication. Mots cles : La communication non verbale; La politique ; Dirigeant politique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it