PROYECTO TERMAS ROMANAS EN HISPANIA. BALANCE DE UNA DÉCADA DE INVESTIGACIÓN (1993-2003)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente artículo realizamos un balance de la investigación realizada entre 1993 y 2003 en el Proyecto “Termas Romanas en Hispania” llevado a cabo en el Dpto. de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la UAM. Este proyecto, conformado por 3 consecutivos, se ha desarrollado al socaire de la propia investigación sobre termas generada en todo el occidente romano y del propio impulso que la arqueología urbana ha protagonizado en nuestra península y que ha permitido conocer un número significativo de termas públicas y balnea privados. Presentamos los principales trabajos que se han ocupado sobre las termas de Hispania así como las conclusiones básicas generadas por cada uno de los proyectos de investigación desarrollados y centrados en distintos aspectos de las instalaciones balnearias (sistema de calefacción, arquitectura, análisis funcional y decoración).Palabras clave: Termas, Hispania, investigaciónAbstractIn this paper we evaluate the investigation carried out by the Prehistory and Archaeology Department of the UAM university between 1993 and 2003 under the Project Roman Baths in Hispania. The project, conformed by three consecutive projects, has been developed boosted by the investigation of baths in all the Roman Western Empire and by the interest in urban archaeology aroused in our peninsula, which has led us to know a significant number of public baths and private balnea. We present the main works on the Baths of Hispania as well as the basic conclusions generated by each one of the research projects developed and focused on different aspects of the bath facilities (heating system, architecture, functional analysis and decoration)Key words: Thermal complex, Hispania, research
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".