MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W185207414

Benign Neglect: Cooperation in the Western Hemisphere. (Perspectives on the United States)

2003· article· en· W185207414 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Makram Haluani

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard international review · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresidential systemLatin AmericansForeign policyState (computer science)Political scienceLawPresidencyAdministration (probate law)SociologyEconomic historyPoliticsHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Governments around the world base foreign policy strategies on their interpretations of US attitudes. They look for both consistencies and changes in the speeches, press conferences, and remarks of senior US officials. The course of international events depends on these attitudes, and the rest of the world knows it. practice is especially true of Latin American countries, whose governments have followed recent trends in US presidential discourse with some concern. On August 25, 2000, Republican presidential candidate George Bush proclaimed, Should I become president, I'll look south, not as an afterthought, but as a fundamental commitment. He assured his audience that he would be the mejor amigo of Latin America. Indeed, as president, Bush's first visit abroad was to Mexico and not to Canada, a significant departure from tradition. According to Bush, Latin America holds a central place in US foreign policy. He even rejoiced in the new century of the Americas when he received Mexican President Vicente Fox at the White House in early September 2001. During that particular state visit, just days before the September 11 attacks, Bush described US ties to Mexico as our most important relationship. But, as US Secretary of State Colin Powell remarked on the flight from Lima, Peru, to Washington, DC, on September 11, 2001, This changes everything. Everything we do is going to be different. Powell cancelled his three-day Peruvian visit, originally planned to bolster support for the war on drugs. action probably represented the cancellation not just of that official visit, but also of a whole range of hopes and dreams for a long benignly neglected continent. An Indispensable Nation It is not difficult to understand the worldwide dimensions of US in economic and military terms. The US population is only 4.7 percent of the global population of over six billion, yet it consumes up to 25 percent of all the energy produced. Of the approximately US$31.4 trillion of annual global economic output, 31.2 percent is produced by the United States alone. The United States is responsible for 36.3 percent of the annual US$811.5 billion spent on global defense. The US share of global expenditures on research and development is a towering 40.6 percent. That the United States is powerful is not the problem for Latin American or other countries; instead, the problem is how the United States throws its weight around. According to Harvard Professor Joseph Nye, US power is much more desirable than The distinction between and soft is not to be understood solely in terms of the selective use of military hardware, but also in the discriminate choice of political targets. Soft therefore implies knowing when and on whom to apply what kind of raw pressure. US military is a major factor m contemporary world politics, and the international community has its misgivings about Bush's foreign policy. He has carried out unilateral bombing of Iraq, ignored unpaid dues to the United Nations, opposed the international antilandmine treaty, labeled countries rogue states and terrorist nations, unsigned the International Criminal Court treaty, displayed an indifferent attitude toward the effects of global warming, and withdrew from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. Yet we must keep in mind that the humanitarian interventions in Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Kosovo were accomplished under firm US leadership. The liberation of Kuwait in 1991 drew the world's admiration for US willingness to do something at a time when most other countries shied away from decisive military action. On the other hand, the tragic 1994 Rwandan crisis was permitted to solve itself, leaving a lasting stain on the humanitarian record not only of the United States, but also of all nations capable of interventon. Present-day practices of international peacekeeping hint at the cost of maintaining US hegemonic power. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard international reviewSame topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207