Bibliographic record
Abstract
As an important part of China’s economy, the family enterprise has its unparalleled strength and inherent weakness compared with the non-family enterprise. The point of implementing innovation management in family enterprise is to make full use of this strength and avoid the weakness at the same time. The fusion of sustainable developmental strategy and the innovation management is the best way to unit strategy and the tactic together, meanwhile, is a kind of sharp weapon which family enterprise use to realize sustainable development. Based on the investigation, inspection and analysis on some family enterprises, the paper makes some researches and discussions on the key factors of family enterprise’s innovation management and sustainable development strategy. Key words: Family enterprise, Innovation management, Sustainable development Resume: En tant qu’une partie importante de l’economie de Chine, l’entreprise familiale a ses avantages et points faibles en comparaison avec l’entreprise non-familiale. Le but de proceder a l’innovation de management dans l’entreprise familiale consiste a mettre en valeur ses avantages en evitant ses desavantages. La fusion de la strategie de developpement durable avec l’innovation de management constitue la meilleure approche d’unir la strategie et la tactique, et peut servir en meme temps d’une arme tranchante pour l’entreprise familiale de realiser le developpement durable. Base sur l’investigation, l’inspection et l’analyse d’entreprises familiales, cet esssai entreprend des recherches et discussions sur les facteurs cles dans l’innovation de management et la strategie de developpement durable de l’entreprise familiale. Mots-Cles: entreprise familiale, innovation de management, developpement durable
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".