Entrepreneurial Activity Self-Production Conditions within Territorial Clusters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of regional entrepreneurship is becoming the key point when forming Russian economy effective competitiveness and especially in terms of current world economic challenges, which determines Russian economy turbulence. The current research focuses on self-production conditions of these territorial systems clusters. A cluster’s formation based on its members’ self-production is thoroughly investigated in the research. The authors analyze clusters, their functions, and tasks definitions of economic analysis. The features of various territorial-production systems of the Russian Federation are considered in the article. Clusters competitive nature is clarified on the grounds of the analysis by using various resources and combinations of factors. An algorithm for forming business self-production conditions within a cluster is defined in the research. The research provides the analysis results of cluster business self-production formation conditions. The key integrating resource, which plays the role of a moving force for development of other resources that are necessary for forming business self-production conditions within a cluster, is elaborated in the article. On the basis of economic territorial systems with self-production features functioning analysis, the authors suggest a new economic approach to business system development by applying new cluster organization forms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it