MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1852382415 · doi:10.1177/08830738050200070201

Short-Term Intellectual Outcome After Arterial Ischemic Stroke and Sinovenous Thrombosis in Childhood and Infancy

2005· article· en· W1852382415 on OpenAlexaff
Ross Hetherington, Larry Tuff, Peter J. Anderson, Brenda S. Miles, Gabrielle deVeber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Child Neurology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversityChedoke HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArterial Ischemic StrokePediatric strokeMedicineThrombosisPediatricsIschemic strokeStroke (engine)Wechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleBayley Scales of Infant DevelopmentIntellectual impairmentIschemiaInternal medicinePsychiatryCognitionPsychomotor learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arterial ischemic stroke is approximately four times more prevalent than sinovenous thrombosis and has been associated with a worse neurologic outcome than sinovenous thrombosis; however, no data are available comparing intellectual outcome after pediatric arterial ischemic stroke and sinovenous thrombosis. We report the short-term intellectual outcome (mean 5.8 months since stroke) in a sample of 72 children, 47 with arterial ischemic stroke, and 25 with sinovenous thrombosis. Intellectual outcome measures were the Full-Scale IQ of the age-appropriate Wechsler intelligence test for older children and the Mental Developmental Index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for younger children. Stroke type did not directly influence intellectual outcome. Intellectual outcome was in the normal range whether the children had suffered an arterial ischemic stroke or a sinovenous thrombosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Child NeurologySame topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsFrench-language works237,207