MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1852927457 · doi:10.4000/books.puc.797

La région du Munster du Sud dans les années 1790

2004· book-chapter· fr· W1852927457 on OpenAlexaff
David Dickson

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Caen eBooks · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aussi déserte et lointaine qu’elle ait pu paraître vue du bord d’un navire en décembre 1796, la baie de Bantry se trouvait dans une région qui avait connu des bouleversements sociaux et économiques remarquables pendant la durée de vie de ses habitants les plus âgés. Elle faisait partie d’une zone commerciale intégrée que l’on peut appeler le Munster du Sud. Cette entité avait été créée par l’essor d’un nouveau centre international de commerce transatlantique, à savoir la ville de Cork dont l...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Caen eBooksSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207