MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1853287980 · doi:10.1109/robot.1999.772461

Task verification facility for the Canadian special purpose dextrous manipulator

2003· article· en· W1853287980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTask (project management)Process (computing)Computer scienceSimulationComputer architecture simulatorParametric statisticsSoftwareHardware-in-the-loop simulationControl engineeringEmbedded systemEngineeringSystems engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a partner in the International Space Station, Canada is responsible for the verification of all tasks involving the special purpose dextrous manipulator (SPDM). In this paper, the concept of an SPDM task verification facility (STVF) is described. The verification process involves three complementary stages. First, a real-time software simulator is used to verify the complete nominal and malfunction procedures. Next, the feasibility of a task involving contact is verified with the help of a hardware-in-the-loop simulator. Finally, a non real-time simulator is used to perform detailed parametric studies given the known tolerances on the components. The paper describes all three stages but emphasizes on the hardware-in-the-loop simulator, the only new facility within the STVF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207