MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1853356869 · doi:10.7202/1077569ar

Stratégies identitaires et stratégies d’acculturation : deux modèles complémentaires

2012· article· fr· W1853356869 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Azzam Amin

Bibliographic record

VenueAlterstice Revue internationale de la recherche interculturelle · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Representations and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous proposons de mener une réflexion épistémologique, théorique et méthodologique à partir d’une confrontation entre le modèle des stratégies identitaires de Camilleri et celui des stratégies d’acculturation de Berry. La comparaison et la discussion de ces deux modèles et de leur contribution à l’étude des dynamiques interculturelles en psychologie montrent la possibilité et la nécessité de les articuler afin de tenir compte de la complexité des phénomènes interculturels. L’articulation de ces deux approches différentes mais complémentaires est basée sur le concept de l’identité dans ses multiples dimensions personnelle et sociale. Ella a comme objectif d’ouvrir de nouvelles perspectives de recherche sur les contacts de cultures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlterstice Revue internationale de la recherche interculturelleSame topicSocial Representations and IdentityFrench-language works237,207