MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1853376568

Le BCG en instillation intravésicale : complications et interactions

2002· article· fr· W1853376568 on OpenAlexaff
Bertrand Paradis, Barbara Vadnais

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontHôpital Saint-Luc
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le Tableau II a la page 20 du Pharmactuel vol. 35 no 1 janvier-fevrier 2002, une information manque dans la colonne « therapie intravesicale au BCG ». Nous reproduisons ci-apres le tableau tel qu’il aurait du apparaitre. Nous nous excusons aupres des auteurs et des lecteurs pour les inconvenients que cette omission a pu causer. La complication la plus redoutee demeure la septicemie; elle a connu une augmentation passant de 0,1 % en 1986 a 0,4 % en debut des annees 1990, probablement a la suite d’une utilisation plus courante du vaccin du BCG. Toutefois, de nos jours, on estime qu’un patient sur 15 000 developpera cette complication. Le Tableau II dresse la liste des complications et leurs traitements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→