MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1853515987 · doi:10.4000/remi.7255

Multiculturalisme, interculturalisme, antiracisme : le traitement de l’altérité

2015· article· fr· W1853515987 on OpenAlex
Micheline Labelle

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue européenne de migrations internationales · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article examine les lignes de tension entre les analyses paradigmatiques du multiculturalisme, de l’interculturalisme et de l’antiracisme, en insistant sur le traitement du rapport majorité/minorités. L’auteure montre, dans une première partie, que ces philosophies politiques ne font pas seulement débat entre elles mais qu’elles sont jugées dépassées et inopérantes par les théories « post » de tous genres qui se déploient aux marges du champ traditionnel de l’immigration et des « études ethniques ». Dans une deuxième partie, elle analyse ces questions dans le contexte du fédéralisme canadien. Une troisième partie porte sur le cas québécois où la gouvernance de l’interculturalisme et de l’antiracisme tente de s’imposer dans un contexte de nation minoritaire. L’auteure fait ainsi ressortir les enjeux analytiques et politiques qui se posent pour les chercheurs et la gouvernance étatique de la diversité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it