MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1853999391 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2014-0035

Fault reconstructions using aeromagnetic data in the Great Bear magmatic zone, Northwest Territories, Canada

2014· article· en· W1853999391 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
N Hayward, Louise Corriveau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTerraneOrogenySeismologyFault (geology)TectonicsFold (higher-order function)Echelon formationGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Great Bear magmatic zone, located in Wopmay orogen, is a 1.875–1.84 Ga belt, 450 km long by 100 km wide of volcanic and allied plutonic rocks interpreted as a Paleoproterozoic magmatic arc. The belt, which contains economically important mineralization, was folded and subsequently cut by a swarm of northeast-striking transcurrent faults, which are part of a regional conjugate fault system interpreted to result from terminal collision of the Nahanni – Fort Simpson terrane. Fault reconstructions based on the interpretation of aeromagnetic data and geological maps provide first-order models of deformation mechanisms associated with, and the configuration of the Great Bear magmatic zone prior to, its dissection by northeast-striking transcurrent faults. The models show that vertical axis block rotation (plane strain) of ∼4.5° can explain fault offsets in the south, but that greater rotation is required to explain many of the displacements in the north. However, offsets on transcurrent faults that border the Camsell River district are greater than can be explained by vertical axis block rotation model alone and may include a component of Mesoproterozoic contractional deformation associated with the Racklan–Forward orogeny. Following reconstruction, iron oxide alkali alteration and associated mineralization, which pre-date transcurrent faulting, form a pair of northerly trending zones on the east and west margins of the belt. We suggest that these zones, whose exposure is related to broad synclinal folding of some of the oldest rocks in the Great Bear magmatic zone, are where iron oxide copper–gold (IOCG)-targeted exploration efforts should be focused on these areas in both outcrop and subcrop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→