MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1856047215 · doi:10.1063/1.2939314

Sub-Barrier Coulomb Excitation of [sup 106,108,110]Sn

2008· article· en· W1856047215 on OpenAlexaff
A. Ekström, J. Cederkäll, C. Fahlander, M. Hjorth‐Jensen, F. Ames, P. A. Butler, T. Davinson, J. Eberth, G. Georgiev, A. Görgen, M. Górska, D. Habs, M. Huyse, Oleg V. Ivanov, J. Iwanicki, O. Kester, U. Köster, B. A. Marsh, P. Reiter, H. Scheit, D. Schwalm, S. Siem, I. Ştefânescu, G. M. Tveten, J. Van de Walle, P. Van Duppen, D. Voulot, N. Warr, D. Weißhaar, F. Wenander, Magdalena Zielińska, P. Demetriou, R. Julin, S. Harissopulos

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcitationCoulomb barrierCoulomb excitationAtomic physicsCoulombPhysicsMaterials scienceNuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reduced transition probabilities between the first excited 2+ state and the 0+ ground state, B(E2;0+→2+), have been measured in 106,108,110Sn using sub‐barrier Coulomb excitation in inverse kinematics at REX‐ISOLDE. The results are, B(E2;0+→2+) = 0.220(22), 0.226(17), and 0.228(32)e2b2, for 110Sn, 108Sn, and 106Sn, respectively. The results for 106,108Sn are preliminary. De‐excitation γ‐rays were detected by the MINIBALL Ge‐array. The B(E2) reveals detailed information about the nuclear wave function. A shell model prediction based on an effective CD‐Bonn interaction in the ν(0g7/2,2s,1d,0h11/2) model space using eeffν = 1.0 e follows the experimental values for the neutron rich Sn isotopes, but fails to reproduce the results presented here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207