MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1856353375

Scattered Documents: Locating the CO Record in Canada

2007· article· en· W1856353375 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Conrad Stoesz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mennonite studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocumentationGovernment (linguistics)Records managementHistoryNational archivesLawPolitical scienceLibrary scienceComputer sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Documentation of the conscientious objectors (COs) in Canada during the Second World War is scattered throughout the country, in personal collections, religious archives and government archives. The following is an overview of the major archival collections in existence on this topic with selected quotations. I have not seen all the records but highlight the ones I have located. I am most familiar with Mennonite records but other communities such as Jehovah’s Witnesses, Hutterites, Brethren in Christ, Quakers, and Doukhobors, as well as government agencies, have their own collections of materials. The three main categories of documents on this topic are government, religious, and personal records found in various archives. Secondary sources such as essays and published books will not be the focus here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mennonite studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207