MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1856420050 · doi:10.7202/017789ar

La photographie de famille au temps du numérique

2008· article· fr· W1856420050 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Irène Jonas

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfances Familles Générations · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rite du culte domestique, l’album de photos de famille pérennise les évènements et les personnages de la vie familiale qui « méritent » d’être conservés et transmis. La production exponentielle de photographies de famille avec l’introduction du numérique et le traitement des archives photographiques familiales sur ordinateur sont-ils en voie de modifier l’élaboration de cette mémoire familiale? Avec le numérique semble se profiler le rêve d’une vie photographiée en continu et d’une mémoire intégrale, incompatible avec le processus même de la mémorisation qui implique de retenir et trier pour éliminer. Cet excès de mémoire familiale, ce rêve de « tout photographier », ces fantasmes de « tout garder », cette passion de « tout stocker » ne risqueraient-ils pas alors de conduire à une mémoire saturée?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnfances Familles GénérationsSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207