MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Regulatory Systems: Two‐Component

2019· other· en· W1856886955 on OpenAlexaff
Tracy Raivio

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Life Sciences · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResponse regulatorRegulatorBiologySignal transductionHistidine kinaseSignallingEffectorCell biologyKinaseComputational biologyGeneticsGeneHistidineBacterial proteinAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two‐component signal transduction (TCST) systems constitute a large class of regulatory proteins that function as signal transducers. Each system comprises a sensor or histidine kinase (HK) and an effector or response regulator (RR), which communicate through a conserved set of phosphotransfer reactions to effect adaptive changes in response to specific environmental signals. HKs and RRs are modular in nature, with variable sensory and output structures appended to the conserved domains that facilitate phosphotransfer mediated signal transduction. Input signals trigger successive conformational changes in domains and protein:protein interactions that alter phosphotransfer, and ultimately an output response mediated by the phosphorylated RR. TCST systems are abundant in bacteria and many microbes utilise multiple TCST pathways to sense and respond to a plethora of environmental and physiological changes. Specificity between cognate HKs and RRs is largely maintained through co‐evolving residues at a conserved interface where the RR docks on the HK. TCST systems are integrated into cellular signalling networks and interact with macromolecules and proteins that connect them to salient regulatory pathways and cellular functions. The current state of knowledge around TCST systems will be summarised, emphasising findings published since the first version of this article in 2006. Key Concepts A prototypical two‐component system is made up of a membrane‐bound sensory histidine kinase that senses a unique environmental or cellular parameter and a cytoplasmic response regulator that controls an adaptive response. HKs and RRs communicate through phosphotransfer reactions that are mediated by conserved domains; signal sensing alters the ratio of HK kinase to phosphatase activity to change the function of the RR by altering its phosphorylation status. HKs and RRs are organised in a modular fashion; a variety of sensing domains can be appended to the HK enzymatic module while diverse output domains with DNA binding, RNA binding, enzymatic activity or protein binding functions are often fused to the C‐terminal end of the response regulator phosphorylated receiver (REC) domain. The HK is a dimer containing a catalytic domain composed of two DHp and CA domains. The DHp domain consists of adimer of two alpha helices connected by a flexible linker that makes a four‐helical bundle and contains the conservedhistidine that is the site of autophosphorylation. The CA domain resembles other ATP‐binding folds and is the enzymatic portion of the HK. The RR consists at its N‐terminus of the conserved receiver (REC) domain, which consists of a five‐stranded beta sheet surrounded by alpha helices and contains the conserved aspartate that is the site of phosphorylation. Signals are detected through conformational changes in a sensory domain that are propagated through some combination of rotational, piston and order to disorder transitions by alpha‐helical transduction elements to the cytoplasmic enzymatic domain of the HK. These movements lead to alterations in HK dimer symmetry that dictate kinase or phosphatase activity. In the inactive state, the cytoplasmic DHp and CA domains of the HK are organised in a symmetrical fashion with the CA domain juxtaposed against the membrane‐proximal end of the DHp four‐helical bundle. The RR REC domain can interact with the inactive HK DHp four‐helical bundle at a more membrane‐distal location in an orientation that would facilitate dephosphorylation of the aspartate. The active, kinase state of the HK is asymmetrical due to a bend or kink in the DHp domain that leads to one CA domain adopting a looser association that positions it well for phosphorylation of a histidine residue. A single RR REC domain can bind near the other CA domain, which is more closely associated with the DHp domain, in a conformation supporting phosphorylation of the aspartate residue utilising the phosphorylated histidine as a substrate. Repeated cycles of DHp domain bending and RR REC domain binding are hypothesised to support successive rounds of HK autophosphorylation and RR phosphorylation in response to signal inputs received from the sensory domain. HKs and RRs regulate and interact with other macromolecules and proteins to connect signalling pathways, coordinate their activities and sense environmental parameters and changes to cellular physiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Life SciencesSame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207