Labeled Initialized Adaptive Play Q-learning for Stochastic Games
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, initial approximation of Q-values of the multiagent Q-learning by the optimal single-agent Q-values has shown good results in reducing the complexity of the learning process. In this paper, we continue in the same vein and give a brief description of the Initialized Adaptive Play Q-learning (IAPQ) algorithm while establishing an effective stopping criterion for this algorithm. To do that, we adapt a technique called “labeling” to the multiagent learning context. Our approach demonstrates good empirical behavior in multiagent coordination problems, such as two-robot grid world stochastic game. We show that our Labeled IAPQ (i) is able to converge faster than IAPQ by permitting a certain predefined value of learning error and (ii) it establishes an effective stopping criterion, which permits terminating the learning process at a near-optimal point with a flexible learning speed/quality tradeoff.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it