MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1857275572 · doi:10.1093/pch/9.7.471

Periorbital and orbital cellulitis in children

2004· article· en· W1857275572 on OpenAlexaff
William N. Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSinusitis and nasal conditions
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrbital cellulitisMedicineCellulitisDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowhere is there a greater discrepancy between paediatricians and ophthalmologists than in differentiating between periorbital and orbital cellulitis in children. The former tends to be overdiagnosed while the latter is often undertreated. Try the true and false self-assessment questions in Table 1 before reading further. Self-assessment questions The answers are at the end of this article Self-assessment questions The answers are at the end of this article The key to understanding these two completely different conditions is awareness of the orbital septum, which is an extension of the periosteum of the frontal bone (Figure 1). It inserts into the tarsal plate of the upper lid, and infection does not penetrate from front to back or vice versa through this tough structure, unless it is breached by a sharp object. Infection in front of the orbital septum causes preseptal or periorbital cellulitis, while disease processes posterior to the orbital septum cause post septal or orbital cellulitis. Therefore, the etiology and treatment of these two conditions is completely different. Insertion of the orbital septum into the tarsal plate of the upper lid Insertion of the orbital septum into the tarsal plate of the upper lid Periorbital cellulitis usually has an obvious local cause such as a sty or chalazion, spreading conjunctivitis or dacryocystitis. The cellulitis may result from a break in the skin such as those caused by superficial trauma, animal bites or local infections. Patients generally will show no systemic signs (Figure 2). There is no leukocytosis or fever, and they appear otherwise well. There is no pain on eye movement, vision is not impaired and there is usually no x-ray or computed tomography evidence of sinusitis. The extent of the infection does not respect the orbital septum because it is anterior to this structure and runs freely above or below the orbital rim. Treatment is directed toward the local cause of the infection (ie, treatment of conjunctivitis, chalazion or herpetic blepharitis). On rare occasions, systemic antibiotics are indicated for a particularly severe inflammation, but they generally are not required. Periorbital cellulitis secondary to infected chicken pox Periorbital cellulitis secondary to infected chicken pox Patients with orbital cellulitis are irritable, toxic and have a fever. They have erythema and induration of one or both lids, often respecting the orbital septum with significant pain on pressure over the lid. The globe may be injected and there may be pain on eye movement. Late signs include limitation of extraocular movement, proptosis, decreased visual acuity and papilledema. An increased white blood cell count and x-ray and computed tomography evidence of unilateral or bilateral sinusitis, particularly involving the adjacent sinus, are likely to be present (Figure 3). Ethmoid sinusitis (arrow) Ethmoid sinusitis (arrow) The etiology of orbital cellulitis is related to the ethmoid bone (lamina papyracea), which is paper thin, separating the sinus from the orbit. Infection spreads from the sinus into the adjacent orbit but lies under the periosteum where it may collect as a subperiosteal abscess, causing exotropia, proptosis and restriction of eye movement nasally (Figure 4). All these signs occur late and are not helpful in distinguishing orbital from periorbital cellulitis early on. Exotropia and proptosis secondary to subperiosteal abscess Exotropia and proptosis secondary to subperiosteal abscess Treatment of orbital cellulitis consists of admission to the hospital and intravenous antibiotics, currently cefuroxime axetil and clindamycin hydrocloride. These drugs take effect in 12 h to 36 h; therefore, worsening of the condition on day 1 is not a source of concern. Subperiosteal abscesses usually respond to intravenous antibiotics, but if it is large, it may need to be drained surgically. Subperiosteal abscesses located superior to the globe must always be drained surgically. After recovery, oral antibiotics such as Keflex (Biocraft Laboratories Inc, USA) are indicated for 10 to 14 days to clear any residual sinusitis. Nasal decongestants and follow-up with an otolaryngologist to ensure resolution of the sinusitis are indicated. In summary, consider the four factors differentiating periorbital from orbital sinusitis in Table 2. Factors differentiating periorbital from orbital sinusitis Factors differentiating periorbital from orbital sinusitis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicSinusitis and nasal conditionsFrench-language works237,207