MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1857967814 · doi:10.4018/ijcini.2015040103

Cognitive Learning Methodologies for Brain-Inspired Cognitive Robotics

2015· article· en· W1857967814 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Computing and Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCognitive roboticsComputer scienceCognitionCognitive architectureLIDAArtificial intelligenceCognitive scienceInferenceKnowledge acquisitionRobotCognitive modelPerceptionRoboticsHuman–computer interactionPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cognitive robots are brain-inspired robots that are capable of inference, perception, and learning mimicking the cognitive mechanisms of the brain. Cognitive learning theories and methodologies for knowledge and behavior acquisition are centric in cognitive robotics. This paper explores the cognitive foundations and denotational mathematical means of cognitive learning engines (CLE) and cognitive knowledge bases (CKB) for cognitive robots. The architectures and functions of CLE are formally presented. A content-addressed knowledge base access methodology for CKB is rigorously elaborated. The CLE and CKB methodologies are not only designed to explain the mechanisms of human knowledge acquisition and learning, but also applied in the development of cognitive robots, cognitive computers, and knowledge-based systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it