Becker Nevus on the Lower Limb: Case Report and Review of the Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Becker nevus is a hamartoma with brown hyperpigmentation and hypertrichosis that usually affects young males. It has a predilection for the upper half of the trunk and proximal upper extremity. OBJECTIVE: This is a case report of a 38-year-old male with a Becker nevus without hypertrichosis on the lower limb and a review of the literature. RESULTS: Including our case report, 12 cases of Becker nevus on the lower limb were identified in the English literature (8 males and 4 females). It has never been reported below the knee. In males, the lesion was not associated with other anomalies, and all but two showed hypertrichosis (six of eight). In 50% (two of four) of women, it was associated with localized lipoatrophy. In one woman, it presented without hypertrichosis. CONCLUSION: The presence of Becker nevi on the lower limb is unusual, and hypertrichosis is not always a feature. Larger studies are required to look into the true prevalence of this presentation and its prognostic value as a marker for other anomalies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".