Odnos turista prema sportsko-rekreativnim sadržajima kao dijelu turističke ponude
Bibliographic record
Abstract
U skladu sa pravcima razvoja banjalučke regije, turizam se naglašava kao jedna od prioritetnih privrednih djelatnosti. Problem istraživanja je utvrditi odnos posjetilaca turističkih destinacija banjalučke regije prema sportsko–rekreativnom vježbanju uopšte i sportsko–rekreativnom vježbanju kao dijelu turističke ponude, te utvrđivanje veza demografskih karakteristika posjetilaca i njihovog odnosa. Generalno posmatrajući, cilj ovog rada je iznalaženje faktora i mogućnosti unapređenja sportsko-rekreativnih sadržaja i objekata u turističkoj ponudi na području banjalučke regije, kao dijela turističke ponude. Dobijeni rezultati ukazuju na pozitivan odnos ispitanika prema sportsko-rekreativnim sadržajima kao dijelu turističke ponude i na potrebu poboljšanja istih. Statistički se značajno razlikuju odnos ispitanika različite stručne spreme gdje pozitivan odnos iskazuju ispitanici sa višom stručnom spremom. Uočeno je da postoji potreba za povećanim učešćem kvalitetnih sportsko-rekreativnih programa koji će svoje mjesto naći u turističkoj ponudi banjalučke regije.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".