Le prisme identitaire du cinéma québécois. Figures paternelles et interculturalité dans Mémoires affectives et Littoral
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deux motifs principaux se dégagent de la production cinématographique québécoise de ce début dexxie siècle : les relations père-fils et l’interculturalité. Ces deux vecteurs du questionnement identitaire convergent dans l’interrogation des fondements du sujet du point de vue des filiations individuelle et collective. La réception critique et l’analyse du récit sont mises à contribution dans l’exploration du rapport dialectique entre l’identité et l’altérité tel qu’il se manifeste dans deux films :Mémoires affectivesde Francis Leclerc (2004) etLittoralde Wajdi Mouawad (2004). Ces deux fictions déclinent des variations sur un même thème, celui du récit des origines et de ses violences constitutives ; ils thématisent la genèse de l’être, la naissance et le geste culpabilisant à l’origine d’un refoulement ou d’un secret qui façonne en creux l’imaginaire du sujet dans le travail d’élaboration psychique ; ils font écho à la multiplicité des composantes culturelles de la société québécoise contemporaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".