MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1858324018

Évolution des lignes directrices sur le traitement de la dyslipidémie Les données pourraient vous libérer

2014· article· fr· W1858324018 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
N. John Bosomworth

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Family Physician · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineGynecologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resume Objectif Comprendre comment les nouvelles lignes directrices sur la prise en charge du risque cardiovasculaire publiees par l’American Heart Association et l’American College of Cardiology (AHA-ACC) peuvent etre interpretees et utilisees dans le contexte canadien. Sources des donnees Les lignes directrices de l’AHA-ACC ont ete examinees, de meme que toutes les references. Des recherches independantes dans PubMed ont ete effectuees pour inclure l’ajout aux statines d’autres antihyperlipidemiants et l’emploi de calculatrices medicales visant a aider le patient a comprendre. Message principal Les nouvelles lignes directrices de l’AHA-ACC s’appuient sur les meilleures donnees probantes disponibles actuellement en matiere de traitement de la dyslipidemie. Cela inclut le risque cardiovasculaire (CV) sur 10 ans comme seuil therapeutique au lieu du taux de cholesterol des lipoproteines de faible densite, de meme que l’abandon des cibles therapeutiques de lipoproteines de faible densite. On met de plus en plus l’accent sur les interventions alimentaires et l’exercice, avec l’amorce d’un effort pour quantifier l’effet de ces interventions. Les statines constituent la principale intervention pharmacologique, et l’ajout d’autres medicaments pour accentuer la baisse lipidique n’est plus recommande. En ce qui concerne l’application au Canada, les tables de risque de Framingham sont plus appropriees pour evaluer le risque que les equations de cohortes regroupees utilisees aux Etats-Unis. Les calculatrices du risque de maladie cardiovasculaire (MCV) devraient contenir de l’information sur l’âge cardiovasculaire et devraient pouvoir illustrer le risque et les interventions de rechange afin d’aider le patient a comprendre et de favoriser la prise de decision eclairee. Conclusion L’attention sur les meilleures donnees probantes concernant le risque CV peut simplifier le traitement de la dyslipidemie tant pour le medecin que pour le patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.173
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.173
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Family Physician→Same topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health→French-language works237,207→