MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1858348981 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0571

Crystal growth and characterization of a semi-organic nonlinear optical (NLO) material: L-phenylalanine cadmium chloride

2015· article· en· W1858348981 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Jagadeesh, H.M. Suresh Kumar, Rajni Kumari

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLiga Portuguesa Contra o Cancro
KeywordsThermogravimetric analysisCadmium chlorideMonoclinic crystal systemSecond-harmonic generationCrystal (programming language)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Fourier transform infrared spectroscopyDielectricEvaporationScanning electron microscopeCharacterization (materials science)Differential thermal analysisAqueous solutionSingle crystalOpticsMaterials sciencePhysicsCadmiumCrystallographyDiffractionCrystal structureOptoelectronicsChemistryNuclear magnetic resonancePhysical chemistryThermodynamicsChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L-phenylalanine cadmium chloride (LPCC) single crystals were grown from aqueous solution using the slow evaporation solution technique. The grown crystals were analyzed through various characterization techniques. Structural study reveals that LPCC belongs to a monoclinic crystal system with the space group P1. The presences of various functional groups were identified by Fourier transform infrared analysis. Optical absorption study was carried out and complete transparency in the visible region was observed with a lower cutoff wavelength of 261 nm. The surface morphology was analyzed through scanning electron micrograph studies. LPCC is thermally stable up to 265 °C as determined by thermogravimetric – differential thermal analysis studies. Dielectric behavior as a function of frequency was examined. The mechanical behavior was studied by Vicker’s microhardness tester. To explore the nonlinear optical property, the Kurtz powder method was employed and second harmonic generation efficiency was determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNonlinear Optical Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207