MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1858458291 · doi:10.1086/321079

The Peculiar Type I[CLC]a[/CLC] Supernova 1999[CLC]by[/CLC]: Spectroscopy at Early Epochs

2001· article· en· W1858458291 on OpenAlexaff
J. Vinkó, L. L. Kiss, B. Csák, Gábor Fuűrész, R. Szabó, James R. Thomson, S. W. Mochnacki

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsDominion Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsLight curveSupernovaAstrophysicsSpectroscopyAbsolute magnitudeGalaxyType (biology)LuminosityResolution (logic)Astronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present medium-resolution (λ/Δλ ≈ 2500) optical spectroscopy of SN 1999by in NGC 2841 made around its light maximum. That the depth ratio of the two Si II features at 5800 and 6150 Å are R (Si II) ≈ 0.63 at maximum indicates that this SN belongs to the peculiar subluminous Type SNe Ia. Radial velocities inferred from the minimum of the 6150 Å trough reveal a steeper decline of the velocity curve than expected for normal SNe Ia, consistent with the behavior of published VRI light curves. A revised absolute magnitude of SN 1999by and distance to its host galaxy NGC 2841 are estimated based on the multicolor light-curve shape (MLCS) method, resulting in M V (max) = -18.06 ± 0.1 mag and d = 17.1 ± 1.2 Mpc, respectively. An approximate linear dependence of the luminosity parameter Δ on R (Si II) is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207