Transparent Semiconducting Oxide Technology for Touch Free Interactive Flexible Displays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amorphous oxide semiconductor thin film transistors and sensors constitute fundamental building blocks for a new generation of applications ranging from interactive displays and imaging to future electronic systems that are unconstrained by form factor. This makes the quest for high mobility materials processed at low temperatures even more compelling, to enable the layering of circuits and systems on plastic and possibly even paper substrates. Transparency is also an attractive feature that enables seamless embedding of electronics for the immersive ambient. This paper reviews the current status of the ubiquitous oxide semiconductor technology for flexible and transparent interactive displays, along with demonstrated examples of continuous thin film and nanowire systems for the transistor and sensor. Issues related to photo-sensing and active matrix operation are discussed along with solutions addressing the problem of threshold voltage instability and its compensation for fast recovery, particularly after light stress. Physics-based compact models for expedient design and simulation of analog and digital circuits are reviewed along with examples of key system building blocks. Finally we attempt to conceptualize a thin film transistor (TFT)-based fully heterogeneously integrated and autonomous system that can be realized using a combination of oxide and other technological routes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".