Functionalizing poly(cyclic olefins) using copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne “click” reactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A robust method for functionalizing poly(cyclic olefin) surfaces comprised of Zeonor 1060R was developed. These surfaces were first oxidized using two separate methods, ozonolysis and oxygen plasma treatment, to increase their hydrophilic properties and produce carboxylic acids on the surface. The resulting acids enabled direct amide coupling with various amines containing azide or alkyne moieties onto the surface. These modified surfaces were further functionalized via copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloadditions (CuAAC) on the surface and the method was optimized for this material. Surface modifications were characterized by water contact angle measurements, fluorescence microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Our data demonstrates a robust method for generating “clickable” Zeonor 1060R surfaces as demonstrated through attachment and subsequent detection of a triazole-linked fluorophore. The method developed enables the systematic modification of any poly(cyclic olefin) surface for functionalization using the click reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".