Bibliographic record
Abstract
La diversidad cultural es uno de las trazos definitorios de nuestra socie-dad. En un contexto, en el que la diversidad -resultado de !as migraciones- se va incre-mentando hay que plantearse una serie de adaptaciones mutuas, más allá de la asimila-ción. La escuela, institución reflejo de las ideologías dominantes en este sentido, debería tomar en consideración esta diversidad y convertirla en riqueza más que en un problema. Fijándonos en la experiencia del Quebec y otras sociedades que han recibido durante muchos años inmigrantes, consideramos interesante tener en cuenta su experiencia y, por ejemplo, revisar a fondo el material escolar, desarrollar la figura del mediador (un profe-sional que puede incrementar la comunicación entre centro y familia, relación que se ve influenciada por barreras lingüísticas, socioeconómicas, culturales e institucionales); etc = The cultural diversity is one of the linea of definition of our society. !n a context, in the one that the diversity -for the migrations- it leaves increasing it is necessary to think about mutual adaptations, beyond the assimilation. The school, reflective institu-tian of the dominant ideologies in this sense, it should take in consideration this diversity and to transform it finto wealth more than in a problem. Noticing the experience of the Quebec and other societies that have received during many years immigrants, considera interesting to keep in mind their experience and, for example, to thoroughly revise the school material, to develop the mediator's figure (a professional that it can increase the communication among centre and family, relationship that is influenced by linguistic, socio-economic, cultural and institutional differences); etc
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".