MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1859646104 · doi:10.7202/032797ar

Observations sur le niveau marin relatif à l’Holocène, à Rivière-du-Loup, estuaire du Saint-Laurent, Québec

2007· article· fr· W1859646104 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jean‐Claude Dionne

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMarine transgressionGeographyGeologyArtGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Rivière-du-Loup, sur la rive sud de l'estuaire du Saint-Laurent, la transgression marine postglaciaire (Mer de Goldthwait), qui a eu lieu entre 12,5 et 12,8 ka. a atteint un niveau voisin de 135 m d'altitude. Le relèvement isostatique a été très rapide. Vers 9000 ans BP, 85 % de l'emersion des terres était déjà réalisé. Trois coupes levées au droit de schorre supérieur actuel ont permis de mettre en évidence l'existence d'un bas niveau marin au milieu de l'Holocène suivi d'une transgression mineure d'une amplitude indéterminée, mais vraisemblablement de l'ordre de ± 8 m. En effet, un dépôt organique relique, daté de 6200 ± 100 à 7140 ± 70 BP et reposant sur des sédiments argileux de la Mer de Goldthwait, est recouvert de sédiments intertidaux limono-sableux stratifiés contenant des colonies de Mya arenaria en position de vie, datées de 5610 ± 90 à 5700 ± 90 BP. La terrasse Mitis (niveau de ± 6m d'altitude) a été construite entre 3000 et 1500 ans BP. alors que le schorre supérieur, qui surmonte un substrat de sable fin et de limon stratifiés en lits minces (ancienne slikke) daté d'environ 850 ans BP, est une construction intertidale relativement récente: moins de 300 ans BP. Ces données corroborent les faits mis en évidence dans cinq autres sites de la rive Sud de l'estuaire du Saint-Laurent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207