Influence of hydrogen concentration on void-related microstructure in low hydrogen amorphous and crystalline silicon materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of implanted hydrogen (up to a concentration level of 3 at. %) on the microstructure of silicon (Si) materials is investigated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy as well as by effusion of hydrogen and of (low dose) implanted helium. Three materials of low original hydrogen concentration, crystalline Si, electron beam evaporated amorphous Si, and plasma-deposited hydrogenated amorphous Si (using high deposition temperature) were investigated. Significant differences between crystalline and amorphous materials were observed. In crystalline Si, implanted hydrogen is found to generate multivacancies that trap diffusing helium while this is not the case in amorphous Si. Accordingly, cavities where hydrogen is located in amorphous Si must be smaller than divacancies. Those cavities in amorphous Si, present from the growth process, that trap helium tend to disappear when the implanted hydrogen concentration increases. Annealing of the materials up to temperatures of 575 °C was also studied. No significant change in the density of voids (trapping helium) occur but in case of crystalline Si the bonding sites of hydrogen as well as the diffusion paths of helium change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".