MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1860066828 · doi:10.3968/6405

A New Waterflooding Characteristic Curve for Naturally Fractured Sandstone Reservoirs

2015· article· en· W1860066828 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Han Shugang, Zhao Chuanfeng

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPermeability (electromagnetism)Relative permeabilityPetroleum engineeringOil fieldGeotechnical engineeringWater injection (oil production)Petroleum reservoirPorosityPetrologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Characteristic curves have found wide applications to analysis and prediction of waterflooding behavior for sandstone reservoirs. Based on the theory of water-oil two-phase flow in dual porous media and taking advantage of the relative permeability curve for naturally fractured sandstone reservoirs, a new waterflooding characteristic curve was derived with an explicit mathematical expression. Verified by physical simulation, numerical simulation and field case, the curve for fractured reservoirs will upwarp at high watercuts, rarely seen in that of non-fractured sandstone reservoirs. In order to improve the quality of analysis and prediction, it is suggested to utilize the new characteristic curve for naturally fractured sandstone reservoirs rather than the conventional curves for non-fractured sandstone reservoirs. Key words : Fractured sandstone reservoir; Waterflooding characteristic curve; Relative permeability curve; Physical simulation; Numerical simulation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207