Gene expression in asthmatic airway smooth muscle: a mixed bag
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has long been known that airway smooth muscle (ASM) contraction contributes significantly to the reversible airflow obstruction that defines asthma. It has also been postulated that phenotypic changes in ASM contribute to the airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) that is a characteristic feature of asthma. Although there is agreement that the mass of ASM surrounding the airways is significantly increased in asthmatic compared with non-asthmatic airways, it is still uncertain whether there are quantitative or qualitative changes in the level of expression of the genes and proteins involved in the canonical contractile pathway in ASM that could account for AHR. This review will summarize past attempts at quantifying gene expression changes in the ASM of asthmatic lungs as well as non-asthmatic ASM cells stimulated with various inflammatory cytokines. The lack of consistent findings in asthmatic samples coupled with the relative concordance of results from stimulated ASM cells suggests that changes to the contractility of ASM tissues in asthma may be dependent on the presence of an inflammatory environment surrounding the ASM layer. Removal of the ASM from this environment could explain why hypercontractility is rarely seen ex vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".