MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1860513533 · doi:10.21083/surg.v5i2.1783

Effect of road salt application on soil conductivity in Canmore, Alberta

2012· article· en· W1860513533 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Michael K Zima

Bibliographic record

VenueSURG Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsSoil salinityEnvironmental scienceGroundwater rechargeSalinitySoil waterHydrology (agriculture)Soil scienceVegetation (pathology)Hydraulic conductivityGroundwaterGeologyAquiferGeotechnical engineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Road salting is a wide-spread practice employed to increase driver safety during the winter months. Salt is, however, very mobile in the environment, toxic to some vegetation and invertebrates in high concentrations, and can seep into aquifers through groundwater recharge. Conductivity of roadside soils was measured as an estimate of soil salinity on the Trans-Canada Highway running through Canmore, Alberta on four consecutive days. Road size and elevation above the surrounding topography were deduced as key factors in determining where highest conductivity was found. Using a cubic polynomial equation for regression, peak conductivity values were estimated to occur at 12.1 m from the edge of the highway. Levels as measured from August 29th to September 1st 2011 demonstrated that soils were weakly to moderately saline. Although excessive soil salinity may be an issue following the spring melts, levels measured at this time of year were not considered to be of any significant environmental concern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSURG JournalSame topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207