Characteristics of the O<sup>+</sup>(<sup>2</sup>P–<sup>2</sup>D) 732.0 and 733.0 nm airglow emissions observed with WINDII and simulated with the C‐IAM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper provides new data on the O+(2P–2D) 732 nm and 733 nm daytime airglow emissions that enhance our understanding of the role that local and conjugate photoelectrons play in the excitation of this emission, updating earlier investigations of its production by solar EUV photoionization of neutral atomic oxygen. The Wind Imaging Interferometer on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, launched in 1991, retrieved these emissions using a filter primarily intended for observations of the hydroxyl P1(2) line but with invalid results. The first corrected results are presented here and compared with simulations by the Canadian Ionosphere and Atmosphere Model. Reasonable agreement is obtained in terms of vertical profiles, solar flux, and solar zenith angle variations. Observations made during local twilight demonstrate that conjugate photoelectrons do not contribute to the excitation of this emission. This paves the way for future determinations of atomic oxygen concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".