MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1860541587 · doi:10.24908/ss.v6i3.3296

Laidler, Keith 2008. Surveillance Unlimited: How We’ve Becomve the Most Watched People on Earth. Cambridge: Icon Books.

2009· article· en· W1860541587 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueSurveillance & Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconEarth (classical element)ArtArt historyComputer scienceAstronomyPhysicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surveillance Limited: How We've Become the Most Watched People on Earth is a comprehensive overview of a widening network of surveillance technologies.Laidler sketches an "overarching surveillance canopy" (83), detailing the surveillance of movement, communication, consumption, identification and biometrics in order to convey the extent to which surveillance has become a totalizing force in our lives.The driving momentum behind Laidler's book is his belief that "the ability of this technology to invade every aspect of our lives is never considered in its frightening entirety…It is time to take stock of 'surveillance unlimited' and to ask just where this huge proliferation of innovative, and largely unknown, technologies may be leading" (11).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurveillance & SocietySame topicClimate Change, Adaptation, MigrationFrench-language works237,207