MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1861078236 · doi:10.5376/ija.2015.05.0014

Stake net Catch analysis of Ashtamudi Lake

2015· article· en· W1861078236 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jyothilal C.S., Bennopereira F.G., C. Sumesh, Sachin S.R., V. Binilshijith

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Aquaculture · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNet (polyhedron)Environmental scienceFisheryBusinessBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A general account on the stake net catch of Ashtamudi Lake during 2009 November- 2010 October is given. Estuaries and back waters are the back bone of marine fishery resources as they serve as the nursery for many of the penaeid prawns and fishes. Stake nets are widely used in the back waters, estuaries and coastal areas and it plays an important role in the commercial exploitation of prawns and fishes. The present study was aimed to analyze the stake net catches, which operated along the Ashtamudi lake. Prawns were contributed over 60% of the total catch. Among them, Penaeid prawns was the major contributor (93%). Fishes contributed only 32% of the total catch followed by mollusks (1%). As prawns become the major contributor of this gear, this net can be considered, a typical Prawn Fishing gear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AquacultureSame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207