MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1861099353 · doi:10.1111/curi.12054

Returning to Our Pasts, Engaging Difficult Knowledge, and Transforming Social Justice

2014· article· en· W1861099353 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurriculum Inquiry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Race Theory in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyEconomic JusticeEnvironmental ethicsHuman rightsPoliticsCynicismCriminologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size AcknowledgmentWe would like to thank Professor Dennis Thiessen for his valuable feedback on an earlier version of this editorial essay.NotesNotes1 Throughout this editorial essay, we use the terms justice and social justice interchangeably. Our dilemma of representing concepts through the use of these words emerges as a result of the expansion and contestation of meanings and manifestations of the concept due to inevitable subjectivity of human understanding and the spread of discourses about justice. We are aware that justice is a social construct that reflects a basic human instinct or ideal of fair treatment and access to rights and opportunities. At the same time, we recognize that the use of the term social justice might reduce the application and benefit of the concept to human species in social domain only, leaving out the non‐human aspects, such as ecological as well as the non‐social dimensions of justice that may embrace individuals at both psychic and emotional levels. As a basic human aspiration, justice or social justice has been a perennial promise for and challenge to education, and one of the most contested ideas in the human intellectual and political history. All human societies, whether democratic or dictatorial, old or young, of different genders and various colours, tend to employ the concept, albeit with different and conflicting notions, purposes, and practices of justice. Despite the failures of justice‐oriented narratives, cynicism around the topic, and its practical "abuses" across the world, the idea of justice has remained alive and appealing.2 The "Other" in Judith Butler's works (e.g., , , ) is a complex concept that draws from political science, sociology, psychoanalysis, critical effect, and cultural studies. At one level, this term refers to sexual and cultural minorities within the United States and the Western world. At another level, the other is Muslims, Arabs, Afghans, Palestinians, or individuals from other nations who have been subject to dehumanization and violence before and after September 11 and whose lives and losses are portrayed as non‐grieveable. The "Other" is also a relational and existential concept, in which Butler proposes the existence and undoing, the interconnectedness and confoundedness of the self and other and subsequently the need for ethical, egalitarian, and deeper affective relations between the self and other.3 Sa'adi Shirazi, also known as Muslihuddin Sa'adi from Shiraz, was a Persian poet who lived in the time of Mongol invasion and dominance in Central Asia (1210–1291). Famous far beyond the Persian‐speaking world, Sa'adi is recognized for his social and moral thoughts.4 Translation by Sarfaroz Niyozov.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it