MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1861189317 · doi:10.1039/c5ob00593k

Organotellurium scaffolds for mass cytometry reagent development

2015· article· en· W1861189317 on OpenAlexafffund
Hanuel Park, Landon J. Edgar, Matthew Anthony Lumba, Lisa M. Willis, Mark Nitz

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic & Biomolecular Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicOrganoselenium and organotellurium chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReagentAqueous solutionChemistryTellurideAlkylTrifluoromethylMass cytometryToxicityNuclear chemistryCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mass cytometry (MC) is a powerful tool for studying heterogeneous cell populations. In previous work, our laboratory has developed an MC probe for hypoxia bearing a methyl telluride mass tag. The methyl telluride was unoptimized, displaying stability and toxicity limitations. Here, we investigate three classes of organotelluriums as MC mass tags: methyl tellurides, trifluoromethyl tellurides and 2-alkyl-tellurophenes. NMR was used to compare the stability of these compounds in aqueous and organic solutions and the compounds were analysed for toxicity in Jurkat cells. The methyl tellurides were moderately stable to aerobic oxidation in organic solution under dry ambient conditions. The trifluoromethyl tellurides were stable to aerobic oxidation in organic solution but decomposed in aqueous solution. The 2-alkyl-tellurophenes proved to be stable in both organic and aqueous solutions under ambient conditions and showed limited toxicity (IC50 > 200 μM) in cell based assays. The synthetic feasibility, chemically stability, and limited toxicity of tellurophenes suggests these groups will be good choices for MC reagent development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic & Biomolecular ChemistrySame topicOrganoselenium and organotellurium chemistryFrench-language works237,207