MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1861283520 · doi:10.1109/icc.1996.542268

Stability of slotted ALOHA access with capture provided by an adaptive array

2002· article· en· W1861283520 on OpenAlex
Gary Leung, S.E. Tavares, P.J. McLane

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlohaRetransmissionTelecommunications linkComputer scienceNetwork packetThroughputComputer networkRandom accessCommunications satelliteRobustness (evolution)Capture effectReal-time computingSatelliteTelecommunicationsEngineeringWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study slotted ALOHA multiple access when a satellite contains an on-board antenna array to attenuate interference. This leads to a capture phenomenon in slotted ALOHA that is provided by the adaptive array. As expected, and as earlier reported in the literature, the adaptive array can improve system throughput. We find that it also improves system robustness. That is, the probabilities of new packet generation and retransmission can vary over a wider range than for slotted ALOHA and still maintain nearly maximum throughput. The same is true for the average packet delay and average system backlog. As in the earlier literature the adaptive beamforming capability on-board the satellite is taken to be ideal. For a system with two uplink and two downlink beams the throughput increase relative to slotted ALOHA is 128% for a wide range of system parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207