Toward the True Second Law Part II: The Untenable Assumption of Current Second Law Thermodynamics and the Come into being of the Negentropic Formulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Second law thermodynamics’, as currently understood, is here proved to be a body of knowledge essentially different from that of Clausius. The rejection on logical grounds of its basic tenet –heat and work as energy forms of the same quality in reversible processes- leads, through a revision of Clausius’ work, to a new body of knowledge, ‘the Negentropic Formulation’, taken by this author to be the true second law of thermodynamics. In it the total entropy change for any given work-producing thermodynamic process is found to be determined by the combination of the opposite sign contributions of the entropic (work degrading) and negentropic (work producing) transformations in it taking place. The efficiency-dependent prevalence of one of these opposites over the other opens the door for irreversible processes with positive, negative, or zero total entropy changes. This notion is at the center of a testable prediction pertaining self-organizing phenomena.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".