Bibliographic record
Abstract
La mondialisation est souvent décrite comme un phénomène principalement économique, et l’intérêt d’une approche anthropologique est d’en saisir la dimension géo-culturelle. Notre but est de faire apparaître tout l’intérêt de cette perspective en nous référant aux travaux d’Arjun Appadurai. Ce dernier met en évidence la crise de l’État-nation traditionnel et l’impact de la circulation des individus et des informations. Dans ce contexte, l’imagination joue un rôle essentiel, il est possible de produire de nouvelles localités. On confronte ici l’analyse d’Appadurai à une autre perspective qui souligne aussi l’importance des déplacements de population, mais place l’accent sur la dimension bio-politique de cette situation. En nous référant aux travaux de Michel Foucault et de Giorgio Agamben, nous montrerons que la prise en compte de cette perspective bio-politique peut permettre de mieux comprendre certains aspects de la mondialisation qui échappent à l’approche géo-culturelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.043 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".