MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1862087130 · doi:10.35767/gscpgbull.47.2.104

Salt Tectonism in the Fort Norman Area, Northwest Territories, Canada

2000· article· en· W1862087130 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
B C MacLean, D. G. Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDiapirDevonianCretaceousPaleontologySalt tectonicsUnconformityPaleozoicTectonicsTectonic phaseLate Devonian extinctionGeomorphologyCarboniferous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A number of salt tectonic structures, pillows and diapirs, occur in the Fort Norman area, Northwest Territories. The structures are cored mainly by salt from the Upper Cambrian Saline River Formation and to a lesser extent by little-known salt from the Lower/Middle Cambrian Mount Cap Formation. Salt flow occurred during at least three, and possibly five, periods of time, and most structures experienced two or more salt tectonic phases. Well-documented phases include: post-Devonian - pre-Turonian; Late Cretaceous; and post Cretaceous (including post-Paleocene). Cambrian and pre-Devonian phases are deduced from equivocal data, and may have been related to epeirogenic events along the Keele Tectonic Zone. The pre-Turonian event was compressional and possibly related to Jurrassic/Cretaceous compressional orogenesis in the cordillera. Post-Cretaceous salt tectonics were at least in part related to Laramide compressional tectonics that produced the Franklin Mountains. One Late Cretaceous diapir has no clear relationship to regional tectonic events. The largest salt structure, the multi-phase Gambill Diapir, probably localized right-lateral strike-slip displacements during the Laramide orogeny. Hydrocarbon exploration possibilities include essentially untested thick Lower and Middle Cambrian strata, possible basal sands at the sub-Devonian unconformity, and Paleozoic carbonate reservoirs in contact with Cretaceous source beds. RESUME Plusieurs structures de tectonique saline, coussins et diapirs, se presentent dans la region de Fort Norman, dans les Territoires du Nord-Ouest. Ces structures sont noyautees surtout par du sel de la Formation de Saline River du Cambrien superieur, et dans une moindre ampleur par du sel peu connu de la Formation de Mount Cap du Cambrien inferieur/moyen. L'ecoulement du sel s'est produit durant au moins trois, sinon possiblement cinq periodes de temps et la plupart des structures ont subi 2 phases ou plus de tectonique saline. Ces phases sont bien documentees et incluent: post-Devonien-pre-Turonien; Cretace superieur; et post-Cretace (incluant le post-Paleocene). Les phases du Cambrien et du pre-Devonien sont deduites a partir de donnees equivoques, et pourraient etre reliees aux evenements epirogeniques trouves le long de la zone tectonique de Keele. Les evenements pre-Turoniens etaient en compression et possiblement relies aux orogeneses en compression dans la Cordillere. Les tectoniques salines post-Cretace ont ete au moins en partie reliees aux tectoniques de compression de Laramide qui ont produit les monts Franklin. Un diapir du Cretace superieur ne montre pas de relation claire avec les evenements tectoniques regionaux. La structure saline la plus etendue, le diapir multi-phase de Gambill, a probablement localise le rejet de decrochements dextres durant l'orogenie Laramide. Les cibles possibles d'exploration pour les hydrocarbures comprennent des strates essentiellement non-testees et epaisses du Cambrien inferieur et moyen, de possibles gres de base sis sur la discordance sub-devonienne, et des reservoirs de carbonate du Paleozoique en contact avec des roches sources du Cretace. Traduit par Lynn Gagnon

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.156
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologySame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207