MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1863051244

Leprosy: a primer for Canadian physicians.

2004· article· en· W1863051244 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrea K. Boggild, Jay S. Keystone, Kevin C. Kain

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLeprosy Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeprosyMedicineMycobacterium lepraeDiseaseDermatologyNeuritisTransmission (telecommunications)ImmunologyErythemaSurgeryPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leprosy is a rare but serious infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. While global prevalence of the disease is decreasing, increasing rates of immigration from countries where leprosy is endemic have led to the recognition of this illness in North America. Classically, leprosy presents as hypopigmented cutaneous macules along with sensory and motor peripheral neuropathies, although the clinical manifestations vary along a disease spectrum. In addition to primary infection, patients may undergo a "reaction," an acute inflammatory response to the mycobacterium, which leads to pain and erythema of skin lesions and dangerous neuritis. Reactions can occur at any time during the course of leprosy, but they tend to be precipitated by treatment. They are a significant cause of impaired quality of life due to marked nerve damage and thus warrant prompt intervention. Although leprosy may have a protracted onset and be difficult to recognize, cure is achievable with appropriate multidrug therapy. Because untreated leprosy can result in permanent, irreversible nerve damage and secondary transmission, early diagnosis and treatment are essential to minimize morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicLeprosy Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207