Book review - Visualizing social science research: Maps, methods, and meaning

Wheeldon, J. &Âhlberg, Μ. Κ. (2012). Visualizing Social Science Research: Maps, Methods, and Meaning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pages: 205. Price: 37·95 CDN (paper). ISBN 978-1-412991-04-9Researchers can benefit from accessing resources that promote their development as purposeful producers and critical consumers of visual displays (Tufte, 2006) and the title of the book Visualizing Social Science Research: Maps, Methods, and Meaning, with its emphasis on visualization, demands the reader's attention. Visualization in research is an important topic because of the for visual displays (e.g., words, numbers, images) to evoke emotion and deepen our understanding beyond textual presentations. The per- spective we offer through this review is based on our interests, experiences, and expecta- tions surrounding the use of visuals within the fields of educational psychology research, program evaluation, and mixed methods. To begin, we offer our own visual representa- tion1 of the book with its existing links as well as (what we believe are) the missing links among the seven chapters (see Figure 1). In this review we discuss three areas of strength as well as highlight where the book does not meet its full potential: intended purpose, audience, and organization.Wheeldon and Âhlberg are to be commended for providing an accessible resource to further the discussion of the innovative topic of visualization within the research process. Research requires visualizing - a critical imaginative process which involves the (trans) formation of a mental image from an abstract idea. The authors explicitly state that the introductory text is aimed at providing a starting place for budding researchers (primar- ily upper-level undergraduate and graduate students) in a range of disciplines within the social sciences.Chapter 1 provides a general overview of the rationale, the research process, and the book. Despite the statement that sometimes the description of a book's organization with- in the preface is not used to its full potential (p. 16), Wheeldon and Âhlberg include orga- nizational details in the preface as well as in Chapter 1. The authors also make an ambitious claim - to provide both an introduction to research in the social sciences while focusing on the use of maps, graphs, and diagrams. In accordance with this claim, we found that the seven chapters can be arranged into two sections (see two shades of components in Figure 1): the research process and the use of maps within methods. While each chapter is of a digestible length and follows a similar layout, the progression assumes a reader will take a cover-to-cover approach. Yet given the proposed supplemental use of the book, it is dif- ficult to assume readers will take a linear approach. We instead expect that students may jump around as needed (according to the inter-connections displayed through Figure 1).Given the assumed purpose of enhancing the use of visuals in social science research, we expected the authors to model Tufte's (2001) graphical excellence through revealing complex ideas with clarity, precision, and efficiency. The authors briefly identify the in- fluence of Tufte on visual representations; yet fail to heed his instruction. We found both simple and cluttered displays that lack substance, progression, and aesthetic appeal. For example, the book includes simple visuals containing information more suited to an in- text list or table (e.g., Seven rules for social science research). The book does include useful examples of concept maps, particularly when related to decision-making in the research process (e.g., Are you interested in a relationship between variables or differ- ences between groups?). Yet we generally found that concept maps, though often used to display a lot of information, can overwhelm a reader if some in-text direction is not pro- vided. Ironically, one cluttered example provides a pictorial overview of the traditional features of concept maps. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.