MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1863146436 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.084003

Global structure of Kerr–de Sitter spacetimes

2015· article· en· W1863146436 on OpenAlexafffund
Kayll Lake, T. Zannias

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCoordinación de la Investigación CientíficaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsPhysicsDe Sitter universeLambdaHorizonde Sitter–Schwarzschild metricMathematical physicsCosmological constantSpacetimeDegenerate energy levelsRotating black holeUniverseQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global structure of the family of Kerr--de Sitter spacetimes is reexamined. Taking advantage of the natural length scale set by the cosmological constant $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}>0$, conditions on the parameters $(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}},M,{a}^{2})$ have been found, so that a Kerr--de Sitter spacetime either describes a black hole with well-separated horizons, or describes degenerate configurations where two or more horizons coincide. As long as the rotation parameter ${a}^{2}$ is subject to the constraint ${a}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\ensuremath{\ll}1$, and the mass parameter $M$ is subject to ${a}^{2}[1+O({a}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}{)}^{2})]<{M}^{2}<\frac{1}{9\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}[1+2{a}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}+O({a}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}{)}^{2})]$, then a Kerr--de Sitter spacetime with parameters in these ranges describes a black hole possessing an inner horizon separated from an outer horizon and the hole is embedded within a pair of cosmological horizons. Still for ${a}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\ensuremath{\ll}1$, but assuming that either ${M}^{2}>\frac{1}{9\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}[1+2{a}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}+O({a}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}{)}^{2})]$ or ${M}^{2}<{a}^{2}[1+O({a}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}{)}^{2})]$, the Kerr--de Sitter spacetime describes a ringlike singularity enclosed by two cosmological horizons. A Kerr--de Sitter spacetime may also describe configurations where the inner, the outer and one of the cosmological horizons coincide. However, we found that this coalescence occurs provided ${M}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\ensuremath{\sim}1$ and due to the observed smallness of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$, these configurations are probably irrelevant in astrophysical settings. Extreme black holes, i.e. black holes where the inner horizon coincides with the outer black hole horizon, are also admitted. We have found that in the limit ${M}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\ensuremath{\ll}1$ and ${a}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\ensuremath{\ll}1$, extreme black holes occur, provided ${a}^{2}={M}^{2}(1+O(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}{M}^{2}))$. Finally a coalescence between the outer and the cosmological horizon, although in principle possible, is likely to be unimportant at the astrophysical level, since this requires ${M}^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\ensuremath{\sim}1$. Our analysis shows that as far as the structure of the horizons is concerned, the family of Kerr--de Sitter spacetimes exhibits similar structure to the Reissner--Nordstrom--de Sitter family of spacetimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology→Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics→French-language works237,207→