MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W186352944 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.18.1.24

The Homelessness of Style and the Problems of Studying Miike Takashi

2009· article· fr· W186352944 on OpenAlex
Aaron Gerow

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJapanese History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtEthnologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les études critiques consacrées au cinéaste Miike Takashi se concentrent généralement sur le caractère outrancier de l’œuvre de ce dernier, de même que sur sa profonde indignation envers la société japonaise. En s’attardant sur l’usage récurrent fait par Miike du plan-séquence, du montage rapide, ainsi que d’une facture visuelle inspirée de la bande dessinée, cet article vise plutôt à faire ressortir le caractère « itinérant » de l’oeuvre du cinéaste, dans laquelle abondent les personnages sans foyer et sans identité claire errant dans un environnement marqué par la mondialisation. L’itinérance s’inscrit également dans les multiples changements de ton et de style rendant les préoccupations nationalistes et les dimensions politiques de l’oeuvre de Miike difficiles à circonscrire. Le travail du cinéaste soulève ainsi des questions fondamentales dans l’étude du cinéma populaire, de même que dans celle des dimensions politiques du cinéma japonais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it