MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W186366751

The impact of vegetation on dissolved organic carbon quality and quantity in peatlands

2010· article· en· W186366751 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alona Armstrong, Rick Bourbonierre, Joseph Holden, Kate Luxton, John Quinton, Mike Waddington

Bibliographic record

VenueEGUGA · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatBiogeochemistryVegetation (pathology)GeographyHuman geographyVegetation coverArchaeologyEngineeringOceanographyLand useCivil engineeringGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(1) Lancaster University, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, United Kingdom (alona.armstrong@lancaster.ac.uk), (2) Environment Canada, Biogeochemistry Research, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7R 4A6, Canada, (3) School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK, (4) United Utilities, Haweswater House, Lingley Mere Business Park, Great Sankey, Warrington, Cheshire, WA5 3LP, UK, (5) School of Geography and Earth Sciences, General Science Building Room 206, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGUGASame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207