MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Belgian Economy characteristics and its experiences

2010· article· en· W1864388782 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huang Jie, Wen-jin Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Productivity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiligenceDue diligencePolitical scienceChinaEconomyHumanitiesEconomicsArtLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Belgium ranks middle in EU countries with highly specified economy, clear property system, efficient and healthy legal as well as financial institutions. It encourages thrifty and diligence which have been a representative sample of high efficiency economy since 12th century. Its success has provided beneficial experiences for China’s economy transformation. Key words: high efficiency economy, thrifty and diligence, high-tech and small companies Resume: La Belgique se figure parmi les pays d’UE avec son economie bien specifique, le systeme de propriete clair, les institutions legales et financieres efficaces et saines. Elle encourage l’economie & diligence qui etait un echantillon representatif de l’economie de haute efficacite depuis le 12e siecle. Son succes a offert des experiences benefiques pour la transformation economique de la Chine. Mots-Cles: economie de haute efficacite, economie & diligence, haute technologie & petites entreprises

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social science→Same topicEconomic Growth and Productivity→French-language works237,207→